African Philosophy II

Bantu Philosophy

In this article I like to speak about the beginning of African philosophy. There always existed of course philosophical thoughts and ideas within the many African cultures. Just think about the many sayings and proverbs, which exist in all African languages. They often express the collective wisdom of a people or language group. All Swahili speakers know for example the saying: “Polepole, ndio mwendo”. Literally translated it means: “Slowly is indeed movement”. At first, this seems to be a contradiction, but it expresses the experience that things done too hastily may be counter-productive. Another example: The Babemba in Zambia say: “Kwapa takucila kubea”. The armpit is never above the shoulder. It means that a son or daughter, though they may be fully grown, can never admonish their father. Children must never be above their parents. It also means that one must never try to live above one’s means.

Although these proverbs express deep wisdom, we would not yet call it a philosophy, because philosophy is not just a collection of proverbs and wise sayings, but it is a system of thought that is written down. Let us then turn to the beginning of professional African philosophy.

Father Placide Tempels

Fr. Tempels, a Belgian missionary, who worked in the 1930s among the Baluba people in the Belgian Congo, wrote a book called “Bantu philosophy” His main intention was to prove to Europeans, that the Africans, among whom he worked, were thinking in a logical way, a fact that until then was not generally accepted. He wrote in “Bantu Philosophy” first published in his mother tongue Flemish in 1945:

“Anyone who claims that primitive peoples possess no system of thought, excludes them thereby from the category of human beings. Every day we notice that these people are by no means just children afflicted with a bizarre imagination”. [p.16]

Tempels fought against the idea, held by many Europeans, including missionaries, that Africans were like immature children, because their way of thinking was different from that of Europeans. Fr. Tempels defence of African thinking met a lot of opposition, even from his own Franciscan brothers, who thought that he had gone too far in his appreciation of African thinking.

How did Fr. Tempels describe the thinking of the Baluba?

  • First there is a belief that all beings – human, animal, vegetable or mineral – have or are forces; and that there is a constant interaction between them.
  • This interaction, which is passive and needs to be activated, unites all beings.
  • Human beings alone, by virtue of their intelligence, are able to do this. They can determine the result of the interaction, which can be either good, as in the case of protective medicine, or evil, as in the case of killing by magic. Morally bad act create disorder in the relations of forces.
  • Among the created beings, the human being stands in the centre. This includes the dead with whom the living maintain a constant relationship.
  • The inferior forces have been created by God in order to help human beings to increase their forces.
  • Wisdom then means the knowledge of these forces and of their effects.
  • The Bantu’s human behaviour is guided by their knowledge of being as force.

Fr. Tempels claimed that not only the Baluba in the Congo, but all Bantu are guided in their activities by this philosophy, of which we have only given some major points.

[To be continued] — Fr. Fritz Stenger

Karibu Africa!

Karibu Africa!

Welcome to Africa!


African Philosophy I

The time has come to take ourselves seriously

There was a time when European philosophers were convinced that the way in which they perceived the reality was the only true one. When the first travellers and explorers came to Africa, they noticed that the people were different from the Europeans in many ways. Not only in their skin colour, but also in the way they dealt with life. This led European philosophers like G. F. Hegel to believe that Africans were not able to think logically.

How did he come to this conclusion? He argued that culture was a manifestation of ther human mind. European explorers, who returned from Africa, maintained that Africans had no culture, because what they saw in africa, did not correspond to European culture. Basing himself on this wrong information, the philosopher Hegel, who never went to Africa, argued that, as a consequence, Africans had no reason, no religion and no history. He thought that they lived in a state of natural innocence, unconscious of themselves. Hegel lived in Germany from 1770 to 1831, and therefore might be forgiven for his views on Africa, because he did not have much information about the continent.

At the beginning of last century, a strong defender of Hegel’s ideas with regards to Africa was the French anthropologist L. Levi-Bruhl. He spoke of the ‘pre-logical’ mind of the Africans, similar to the mind of small children. He divided human societies into two types: the civilised [Europe] and the primitive [Africa]; or the healthy on one side, and the sick, savage and inferior on the other. Later on, the alleged cultural superiority of Europe and the West served as justification for colonialism. Europe considered it as its moral duty to raise Africa and the Africans to the level of the West.

African Philosophy

Now let us turn to African philosophy. How old is it? What time span does it cover? We cannot give exact dates. There has always been an oral tradition of popular myths and proverbs, which express the collective wisdom of an ethnic group. African philosophy, however, is more than a critical understanding of popular myths, proverbs and customs: it is, in fact, a product of the modern age.

The introduction of writing played an important role, because writing helps us to pin down ideas, and makes them thus available for later use. The first one to write a book on Bantu Philosophy was not an African, but a Belgian missionary working in the Congo: the Franciscan Fr. Placid Tempels. Basing himself on his own observation, he wrote around 1930: “To declare that primitive peoples are completely lacking in logic, is simply to turn one’s back on reality. Every day we are able to note that primitive peoples are by no means just children afflicted with a bizarre imagination”. Full of sympathy for the Bantu, but in a somewhat patronising way, Tempels wrote for European readers and missionaries. His famous book, Bantu Philosophy, was a kind of guide to understand the Bantu soul. He explained that for the Bantu, all beings – human, animal, vegetable, and inanimate – have their ‘vital force’. Among the created beings, the human being stands in the centre. Human beings include the dead with whom the living maintain a constant relationship. God has created the inferior forces in order to help the humans to increase their force, for example by eating the meat of animals.

Tempels wanted to show that it was wrong to think of Africans as uncivilised and primitive, that their behaviour was guided not by the absence of logic, but by the use of a complex logic, which differed from Western logic. Who, after all, has the right to believe that one’s own way of thinking is the only right way? Unfortunately, this was the attitude of the West for centuries.

African philosophers today make great efforts to liberate Africa intellectually from the West and to stand on her own feet. Gone are the days when African philosophy was seen just as an inferior form of European philosophy. The Kenyan philosopher D. A. Masolo, who taught at the University of Nairobi, writes in his recent book, African Philosophy in Search of Identity, that the debate on African philosophy today is the African response to the Western discourse on Africa, which means the distorted image that the West has created of Africa. Unfortunately, even many educated Africans have adopted this view of Africa as a primitive and uncivilised continent. They often look at their African mother tongue as inferior, and prefer to speak English or French.

African philosophers of today, like D.A. Masolo and P. Hountondji, from Benin, K. Appiah from Ghana, T. Serequeberhan from Ethiopia, and especially V.Y. Mudimbe from the Congo, to name but a few, are united in their struggle for a search of a true identity, which will of course vary according to the different cultures and traditions. It is a struggle quite similar to the struggle for political independence of Jomo Kenyatta, Kwame Nkrumah, Leopold Senghor and Julius Nyerere. African philosophy, which originated as a response to the distorted Western representation of Africa, no longer feels the need to try to assert itself in the face of the powerful European system of thought. As Hountondji says, “the time has come to take ourselves seriously”. Indeed! This struggle of ideas will hopefully put to rest the idea of Africa as one of the ‘primitive sisters’ of Europe.

Fritz Stenger, M.Afr.

The Power of Symbols in African Culture

Symbols and Signs

We come across symbols or symbolic actions wherever we are. Often we are not even aware of it, and sometimes we are unable to understand or to interpret certain symbols, because we are not familiar with their meaning. Let us take the symbol of the cross, the meaning of which is very familiar for Christians, but not necessarily for Hindus or Moslems. They have their own symbols. But even for Christians, the symbol of the cross may take on various meanings. This shows us that symbols are by nature open for various interpretations.

A symbol is not identical with the object that it symbolises, because it is not like a photograph that reproduces an object accurately. The purpose of a symbol is rather to illuminate it. If a symbol is to work effectively, it has to be simplified and sharpened to a degree that reduces it to something like a sketch-map of the reality to which it is intended to serve as a guide. A symbol opens the door into a larger world. It goes beyond that what is visible and tangible. It opens the door especially to the world of mystery.

Signs, on the other hand, for example traffic signs, are not open to interpretation, but have a precise meaning: When the traffic light is red, it means that you must stop until it changes to green. A sign needs to be precise and unmistakable.

Symbols say more than words

In every department of human life, symbolic expression is the way to creative freedom. The symbol stands for openness, for pointing towards alternative possibilities, for readiness to experiment in the hope of gaining a fuller understanding of reality. Symbols are often used when words are unable to express complex realities: a deep feeling of love for a person may be expressed by giving that person a red rose. The unfathomable mystery of God is sometimes symbolised by a triangle, which has no beginning and no end. Symbols are also historical. It means they can become out of date or empty, like the wedding rings of a divorced couple.

Religious symbols

Religions make use of many symbolic actions and gestures in order to express their relationship to God: Catholics genuflect in church and Moslems bow or prostrate to show their submission to Allah. Symbols have the power to connect us to something greater than ourselves, to the unknown or ultimate. Man’s ultimate concern can only be expressed symbolically, because symbols can say more than words. In this sense, a symbol is a powerful instrument to extend our vision, to stimulate our imagination and to deepen our understanding. Without symbols, we are unable to arrive at the truth. Words alone cannot express the whole reality. People in the Western world who are influenced by an unconscious materialism, often equate reality with physical, measurable reality, whereas Africans can often see the symbolic meaning of things and events, because they are convinced that reality is more than what can be seen and measured. They are often able to see a symbolic or spiritual meaning in events like sickness, death and disasters.

The symbol has a long-established relationship with myth, which are sacred stories that define the human condition and man’s relation to the sacred or holy. Often containing a collection of symbolic forms, actions, expressions, and objects, myths describe gods, demons, human beings, animals, plants, and material objects that are themselves bearers of symbolical meanings and intentions.

In some parts of West Africa, for example, a judge might preside over criminal trials while wearing a mask to symbolize his power.

White masks among the Fang are associated with death or spirits. This type of mask is worn by members of the ngil society, who are charged with finding and punishing wrongdoers.

A Powerful Symbol: The Golden Stool of the Asante in Ghana

The enormous power of symbols can be seen in African culture. The Asante in the north of Ghana have always considered the Golden Stool more important than all the Asante put together, including the king himself, because it has always been seen as a symbol of unity among the Asante. It was in fact the symbolic power of the Golden Stool that created the Asante nation. The story goes back to the 17th century when there was no Asante kingdom. At that time there were several independent chiefdoms scattered all over what is currently the Ashanti Region of Ghana. They all owed allegiance to the chief of Denkyira, who collected gold and wives from them. The chief of Kumasi, Osei Tutu, decided to put an end to this insult and tyranny. He created the Golden Stool and convinced everybody that he had conjured it from heaven. He asked all the chiefs to give him clippings of their finger and toenails and also a bit of their hair. With this, he made a concoction and smeared the stool with it. He told the chiefs that they were, from then on, one nation with one soul contained in the stool. Throughout the history, the Golden Stool had established itself as the force of unity and power. Today the Golden Stool is housed in the Asante royal palace in Kumasi. The stool never touches the ground; it rests on its own platform or on animal skins. No one is ever allowed to sit on it. When the Asante king is inaugurated, he is lowered over the stool three times without touching it. The Asante are proud that although the British conquered their nation, they never surrendered the stool.

Kwanzaa in the USA

The need for a symbolic expression of their identity as Afro-Americans in the USA is demonstrated in the recently introduced feast of “Kwanzaa”, an African American holiday that celebrates family, community, and culture. It is a seven-day holiday that begins on December 26 and continues through January 1. The name of the holiday comes from the Swahili words matunda ya kwanza, which mean “first fruits.” The holiday’s roots are in harvest celebrations that are recorded from the earliest periods of African history. At each evening meal during Kwanzaa, family members light one of seven candles to focus on the principles in a ritual called “lifting up the light that lasts.” This lifting up means upholding the Nguzo Saba and all the other life-affirming and enduring principles that reaffirm the good of life, enrich human relations, and support human flourishing. In addition to the mishumaa saba (seven candles), the other basic symbols of Kwanzaa are the mazao (crops), symbolic of African harvest celebrations and of the rewards of productive and collective labor; the mkeka (mat), symbolic of tradition and history and therefore the foundation on which to build; the kinara (candleholder), symbolic of ancestral roots and the parent people, or continental Africans; muhindi (maize), symbolic of children and the future of African people that they embody; the kikombe cha umoja (unity cup), symbolic of the foundational principle and practice of unity that makes all else possible; and zawadi (gifts), symbolic of the labor and love of parents and of the commitments made and kept by children. There are also two supplemental symbols: a representation of the Nguzo Saba and the bendera (flag), which contains the colors black, red, and green. These colors are symbolic, respectively, of African people, their struggle, and the promise and future that come from their struggle. A central and culminating event of the holiday is the gathering of the community on December 31 for an African karamu (feast). The karamu features libation and other ceremonies that honor ancestors, narratives, poetry, music, dance, and other performances to celebrate the goodness of life, relationships, and cultural grounding.

Kwanzaa ends January 1 with the Siku ya Taamuli (Day of Meditation), which is dedicated to sober self-assessment and recommitment to the Nguzo Saba and all other African values that reaffirm commitment to the dignity and rights of the human person, the well-being of family and community, the integrity and value of the environment, and the reciprocal solidarity and common interests of humanity. One way that persons conduct this self-assessment is to ask themselves three questions: Who am I? Am I really who I am? Am I all I ought to be? In this way, they measure themselves in the mirror of the best of African culture and history and recommit themselves to standards and practices of human excellence that reflect and support those cultural ideals.

The Turkana in Uganda: Animals as Symbols of Wealth

Our whole life is governed by symbolic actions and gestures, which has strongly influenced our behavior and interaction with one another. The way we greet one another, for example, has deep symbolic meaning and differs from one ethnic group to another. For the Turkana people in Northern Uganda, animals are symbols of wealth. A person without livestock, no matter what other property he has, is poor. Their daily lives are filled with symbolic actions: They have at least ten verbs for cutting ears of humans and animals. This practice is also found among other East African desert nomads, such as the Masaai. When a child dies, its successor has the tip of its right ear cut off. The action prevents the death of other children in the family. To cut symbolizes to separate, and in this case the separation is from death. When a man is buried, his head faces eastwards and towards the rising sun, which is a symbol of life.

Our ultimate concern and our deepest mysteries can only be expressed symbolically, because symbols alone are able to express the ultimate.

Fritz Stenger, Nairobi

Where is Africa?

Did you ever wonder why we speak of “Greenwich Mean Time” [GMT]? Greenwich, a small town south of London, has changed the clocks and watches of the world. There is nothing special about the so-called “Zero Meridian” which passes through Greenwich, because the same longitude passes also through towns in northern and western Africa. Why not name the world’s “mean time” after one of those towns? Why do Africans not rename the Greenwich meridian into the Gao meridian, to remind them not of an English palace built by Henry VIII, but of a great ancient capital in West Africa?

The fact that the whole world measures the time with reference to GMT is a leftover of “Eurocentrism”. It means that Europe was seen as the model and yardstick of normality in every respect. Colonialism was finally a result of this perception. People perceived Europe as the center of the world. Europe, in fact, developed the concept of the world in the wake of its voyages of discovery in the 15th and 16th century, and it also imposed its concept on the outlook of peoples of other continents, including Africans.

It is hardly possible to overestimate the enormous impact of Europe upon our perceptions of ourselves as Africans. Some of these effects are obvious, such as the choice of Greenwich in Britain as the “mean time” for the alarm clocks of the human race. Others are more subtle. We may ask: is Europe north of Africa? Is Europe up and Africa down in geographical terms as well as in income, power, intellectual capacity, and global status? Of course, the maps say that Europe is north of Africa and therefore up. But that decision was arbitrarily made by European mapmakers. Whether Europe is above Africa or below depends only on the vantage point in the cosmos from which an observer looks on the planet earth.

Even with regard to the size of the African continent, it is quite remarkable how far Eurocentrism has influenced cartographic projections. The most common worldmap, based on the Mercator projection, a 16th century cartographer from Germany. He shows North America as one and a half times the size of Africa, but Africa is, in fact, three and a half times the size of the US. On the Mercator projection Greenland in the north of Europe appears almost as big as Africa, which is ridiculous, because Africa is 15 times bigger. The visual memories of millions of children across generations have carried distorted ideas about the comparative physical scale of northern continents in relation to southern ones. Africa is a continent larger than China and India added together. Size matters!

Africa might have been denied its full credentials as part of the human family, but must it also be denied its size in square miles? Should we not include in every school atlas the alternative scenario of “turning the world upside down” with South America at the top and North America below, with Africa above and Europe beneath, in order to demonstrate the danger of Eurocentrism even in mapmaking?

Exactly 400 years after Mercator, another German, Arno Peters, produced in 1967 a world map that represents the size of countries more accurately. Peters has restored Africa to its real size, but he still puts Europe at the top of the world. May be, future mapmakers should put the globe the right side up, restoring a much needed status to the cradle of humankind, Africa, where human history first began.

Fritz Stenger

This article was inspired by Ali Mazrui’s book The Africans, Boston 1986.

Next Newer Entries